Rachel Mitchell, the career sex crimes prosecutor from Arizona hired to question Dr. Christine Ford in regard to her allegations that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her as a teenager, has written a five-page letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee completely exonerating Brett Kavanaugh and noted in her 30-point letter the many discrepancies in Ford’s allegation, stopping just short of calling it totally bogus.

Mitchell also made it clear in her letter to the Committee that because of the many discrepancies, the refutals by all four witnesses named by Ford, and the complete lack of evidence that no “reasonable (sane) prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the Committee.”

“….There is no clear standard of proof for allegations made
during the Senate’s confirmation process. But the world in which I work is the legal
world, not the political world. Thus, I can only provide my assessment of Dr. Ford’s
allegations in that legal context.

In the legal context, here is my bottom line: A “he said, she said” case is incredibly difficult
to prove. But this case is even weaker than that. Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the
event, and those witnesses either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them. For
the reasons discussed below, I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this
case based on the evidence before the Committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is
sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard.”