Rachel Mitchell, the career sex crimes prosecutor from Arizona hired to question Dr. Christine Ford in regard to her allegations that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her as a teenager, has written a five-page letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee completely exonerating Brett Kavanaugh and noted in her 30-point letter the many discrepancies in Ford’s allegation, stopping just short of calling it totally bogus.
Mitchell also made it clear in her letter to the Committee that because of the many discrepancies, the refutals by all four witnesses named by Ford, and the complete lack of evidence that no “reasonable (sane) prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the Committee.”
“….There is no clear standard of proof for allegations made
during the Senate’s confirmation process. But the world in which I work is the legal
world, not the political world. Thus, I can only provide my assessment of Dr. Ford’s
allegations in that legal context.
In the legal context, here is my bottom line: A “he said, she said” case is incredibly difficult
to prove. But this case is even weaker than that. Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the
event, and those witnesses either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them. For
the reasons discussed below, I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this
case based on the evidence before the Committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is
sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard.”
Mitchell's point is that this circus would never ever become a "real trial," as you leftists so desperately want it to be. And, Mitchell's letter is not only damning to Ford's bogus case, but completely exonerates Kavanaugh. There is no evidence. An allegation is not evidence!
— Thomas Madison…. I follow back! (@tmadison200) October 1, 2018
How is Mitchell partisan? Because she made an honest, professional assessment of Ford's bogus story and that doesn't line up with your Trump-hate agenda? Yeah, that's what I thought.
— Thomas Madison…. I follow back! (@tmadison200) October 1, 2018
The reason she asked that question is because the letter appears to have been written by someone with a Middle School writing level, certainly not a PhD. That suspicion has been raised by many. No PhD is that bad a writer.
— Thomas Madison…. I follow back! (@tmadison200) October 1, 2018
Are you dense? The Republicans allowed the Democrats and their attorneys to hammer Kavanaugh for a week. When it came to questioning Ford, rather than appear partisan by questioning her themselves,, they hired an outside, non-partisan expert in sex crimes to question her.
— Thomas Madison…. I follow back! (@tmadison200) October 1, 2018
Be sure to tell the board in your letter that you are a Trump-hater and you don't appreciate someone questioning a bogus story designed to destroy a man's life. THAT does not agree with your Trump-hating agenda and you don't appreciate that. No need to tell them. They will know.
— Thomas Madison…. I follow back! (@tmadison200) October 1, 2018
https://twitter.com/cs00582scs/status/990136834704527360
Careful What You Ask For? Feinstein & Ford Attorneys Now Under Investigation *VIDEO* #Kavanaugh #Ford #Feinstein #SupremeCourt https://t.co/DQ2pPtviuo pic.twitter.com/swx0Q6omj7
— The Overpasses Guy (@o4america) October 1, 2018
