Perfect! To cement his legacy in the basement of presidential history Barack Hussein chose fake news rag Rolling Stone for his 11th hour interview, during which he discussed the abject failure of the Democrat Party, but never once accepted blame for it as the party leader for the past eight years.

No, it wasn’t Hussein’s fault. It was the fault of all those rednecks, sitting in all those bars across flyover country, all hypnotized by Fox News, which Hussein believes is the true Satan and the reason that he is hated from sea to shining sea. At least he recognizes that, even if he does blame it on someone else.

So, why would Barack Hussein choose Rolling Stone for one of his final interviews as President. God knows the Stone is not exactly credible, rating just below Mad Magazine on the credibility index. The reason Hussein chose Rolling Stone is they are friendly, non-threatening, blindly loyal, and practice a complete disregard for the truth, making Stone the perfect choice for the final interview of a shamelessly dishonest egomaniac.

Trending: Malik Obama is a devoted Trump supporter, despises kid brother Barack, and just wrote a book slamming the illegitimate ex-president

Remember, it was Rolling Stoned that published the lie involving a fraternity gang rape that never happened, nearly destroying the lives and reputations of several innocent young men who could have gone to prison. No vetting, no investigation, just publishing lies. Link…. Rolling Stoned

take our poll - story continues below

Should the Government be Mandating Masks?

  • Should the Government be Mandating Masks?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Powdered Wig Society updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Rolling Stone’s interview of Barack Hussein could have been titled, “When Two of the World’s Most Arrogant Liars Meet.”

“What do you get when a failed president sits down with a rape-hoaxer?” asks Jim Treacher, writing for The Daily Caller. “You get some very satisfying schadenfreude, that’s what. Absolutely delicious.

President Barack Hussein Obama, the second most powerful human being in the world, has just 50 days left in office. He’s getting ready to turn over the White House to a man he clearly despises. He just watched the voters reject everything he stands for. They’re finally getting back at him for everything he’s done to them over the past eight years. His precious legacy lays before him in ruins.

What better way to wallow in his misery than to sit down with the disgraced publisher of the discredited Rolling Stone magazine?

Jann S. Wenner — who is still defending everything in his publication’s UVA gang-rape story except for, y’know, the gang-rape — opens on a funereal note:

My final interview with President Obama in the White House had been scheduled for the day after the presidential election. I had hoped to look back on what he had achieved over eight years and the issues that mattered the most to him and to the readers of Rolling Stone, hear his advice for Hillary and about the road ahead. It was to be the ‘exit interview,’ his tenth cover for Rolling Stone, our fourth interview together…

Well, it’s still an exit interview. Just not the sort Janny-baby wanted.

You can read the entire interview, if you think that’s a good use of your time. But the following is all you really need to know about the impenetrable bubble of delusion these guys live in:

You think it’s still a progressive country?

I think that nothing is determined, but that the number of people who have a strong belief in a fair, just, equal, inclusive America is the majority and is growing.

And part of the challenge, though, that we do have, and this is something that I’ve been chewing on for a while now, is that there is a cohort of working-class white voters that voted for me in sizable numbers, but that we’ve had trouble getting to vote for Democrats in midterm elections. In this election, [they] turned out in huge numbers for Trump. And I think that part of it has to do with our inability, our failure, to reach those voters effectively. Part of it is Fox News in every bar and restaurant in big chunks of the country, but part of it is also Democrats not working at a grassroots level, being in there, showing up, making arguments.

That’s right, Barry. None of what’s happening has anything to do with you. It’s not about anything you’ve said or done. It’s that damn Fox News. It’s all those meanies in ‘big chunks of the country.’ Why, they refuse to walk into a bar or restaurant that’s not playing Fox News! They’re the ones who did this to you.

As Jay Caruso notes:

If Fox News had the level of power President Obama claims, he wouldn’t have been elected, let alone re-elected.

Well, it’s not about what’s true. It’s about what makes Obama feel better about himself.

And as Stephen Miller (the blogger, not the Trump operative) points out:

Yep. It’s going to be fun listening to Democrats scream about free speech, after they’ve spent eight years trying to shut it down.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/11/30/obama-to-jann-wenner-i-couldve-been-great-if-not-for-fox-news/#ixzz4RYUsZFx2