Obama Laments Media Polarization: You’ve Got ‘Fox/Limbaugh Folks’ and ‘MSNBC Folks’

President Barack Obama* thinks part of the reason American politics has become so polarized is because of the “balkanization” of the media.

Vox.com, a viral content machine best known as an “explainer journalism” outfit, posted the first portion of its lengthy interview with the president on Monday morning.

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Powdered Wig Society updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

When interviewer Ezra Klein asked the president* how he feels about being the “most polarizing president since we began polling,” and how each of the two presidents before him had a similar experience, Obama responded [emphasis added]:

[A] lot of it has to do with the fact that a) the balkanization of the media means that we just don’t have a common place where we get common facts and a common worldview the way we did 20, 30 years ago. And that just keeps on accelerating, you know. And I’m not the first to observe this, but you’ve got the Fox News/Rush Limbaugh folks and then you’ve got the MSNBC folks and the — I don’t know where Vox falls into that, but you guys are, I guess, for the brainiac-nerd types. But the point is that technology which brings the world to us also allows us to narrow our point of view. That’s contributed to it.

Trending: Fascistbook has banned Powdered Wig Society and Thomas Madison, as well as hundreds of other conservative publishers

Yes, the “brainiac-nerd” set are riffling through a “news for dummies” outfit. The president also cited gerrymandering*** as part of the problem: “There’s no incentive for most members of Congress, on the House side at least, in congressional districts, to even bother trying to appeal,” he said.

And he explained to the explainer journalists how he’d fix the problem:

I would love to see some constitutional process that would allow us to actually regulate campaign spending the way we used to, and maybe even improve it. I’d love to see changes at the state level that reduce political gerrymandering. So there’s all kinds of structural things that I’d like to see that I think would improve this.

Read more….