Barack Hussein will go down in history as not only the worst president in American history by far, but will also be viewed as a traitor to anyone who understands the definition of treason, giving aid and comfort to the enemy, which he was doing even before he was elected president.
Iran is our enemy. Has been since the Shah was deposed in 1979, during the administration of America’s second-worst president, Jimma Cotta. Many thousands of Americans have been slaughtered at the hands of Iran since then.
Yet, Muslim sympathizer Barack Hussein has not only appeased the world’s most detestable state-sponsor of terror, he gifted America’s greatest enemy with billions of dollars, over one billion dollars in cash, palletized and flown to Tehran, before he left office, many more billions paid to them later. Clearly, the act of gifting Iran billions of dollars constitutes giving comfort and aid to our enemy, the classic definition of treason.
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Did SCOTUS make the right decision on medical mandates for large businesses?
by Lawrence David
The latest charge against President Trump, unless Democrats have dreamed up one or two more since last Friday, is that by sending Rudy Giuliani to Ukraine to conduct an investigation he has breached some imaginary rule regarding the use of regular channels, only.
In a different world this would be hailed a smart move given Giuliani’s history as a highly respected crime buster. Not in the political sewer of Washington.
Instead of arguing the merits of President Trump’s use of an ‘irregular channel’ let’s take a stroll down memory lane and compare Barack Obama’s use of similar tactics.
In response to a question about the Obama administration’s apparent indecisiveness about Iran, Michael Ledeen wrote this:
(PJ Media) They do have a strategy, but they prefer to appear indecisive. That’s because the strategy would likely provoke even greater criticism than the false confession of endless dithering.
The actual strategy is detente first, and then a full alliance with Iran throughout the Middle East and North Africa. It has been on display since before the beginning of the Obama administration. During his first presidential campaign in 2008, Mr. Obama used a secret back channel to Tehran to assure the mullahs that he was a friend of the Islamic Republic, and that they would be very happy with his policies. The secret channel was Ambassador William G. Miller, who served in Iran during the shah’s rule, as chief of staff for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and as ambassador to Ukraine. Ambassador Miller has confirmed to me his conversations with Iranian leaders during the 2008 campaign.
Ever since, President Obama’s quest for an alliance with Iran has been conducted through at least four channels: Iraq, Switzerland (the official U.S. representative to Tehran), Oman, and a variety of American intermediaries, the most notable of whom is probably Valerie Jarrett, his closest adviser. In recent months, Middle Eastern leaders reported personal visits from Ms. Jarrett, who briefed them on her efforts to manage the Iranian relationship. This was confirmed to me by a former high-ranking American official who says he was so informed by several Middle Eastern leaders.
Making this ‘back-channel’ even more sketchy,when Obama’s envoy first made contact with Iran he was a senator.
That was before Obama was president. His minions, likely after consulting with him, continued using ‘irregular channels’ after the election of Donald Trump.
Lawrence David writes for Illicit Info