President Trump has the right to enforce federal immigration law and require states do the same and withhold federal funding from those that refuse. So says federal judge William Orrick.
A federal judge ruled Monday that the Trump administration does not have to immediately pay California the withheld funds President Donald Trump refused to award to the sanctuary state, reports Western Journal.
Earlier in February, Trump declared he would withhold federal funding from California after it became a sanctuary state via a bill signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown.
The law prohibits law enforcement agencies from inquiring about people’s immigration status or using jails to uphold federal immigration laws, Fox News reported.
“If we have to, we’ll defund,” Trump said, according to the Los Angeles Times. “We give tremendous amounts of money to California. California in many ways is out of control, as you know.”
Now, U.S. District Judge William Orrick has ruled that the Trump administration can delay the $1 million grant that has been withheld from the Golden State, The Associated Press reported.
Although he ruled against the state’s request to turn over the funds, he also rejected the U.S. Department of Justice’s request to dismiss the lawsuit in its entirety.
Orrick added that the “weighty and novel constitutional issues” raised by the lawsuit would benefit from further discussion.
This is a point I haven’t seen made yet, so I will make it. The issue at hand is not California’s bleeding heart liberalism, believing they are righteous in their resistance to federal law. They have no such right.
The issue is that these criminals California are protecting can very easily get into a car and drive across the border into Arizona, Nevada, or Oregon, and from there any other place in the United States to commit their murder and mayhem.
California has NO right to deny all of America the safety that President Trump is attempting to provide.
“The question is whether the federal government is required to return federal funds to states that buck U.S. immigration policy by creating sanctuary city or sanctuary state rules that prevent local police from cooperating with federal officials,” breaking.americannewscentral.com noted.
Last year, “U.S. District Judge Harry D. Leinenweber (Chicago) said the DOJ could require Byrne Memorial grant recipients to certify compliance with the federal immigration law at issue,” according to the AP.
On Tuesday, the Department of Justice filed a suit against the state of California modeled after one brought against Arizona by former President Barack Obama’s DOJ, which affirmed the federal government’s authority to set immigration policy.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions specifically singled out Oakland’s Mayor Libby Schaff, who tipped off criminal illegal aliens of an impending Immigration and Customs Enforcement raid in the city.
“So here’s my message to Mayor Schaff,” Sessions said. “How dare you, how dare you needlessly endanger the lives of our law enforcement officers to promote a radical open borders agenda?”
The lawsuit alleges obstruction of federal immigration enforcement and targets “sanctuary state” laws passed by the legislature in 2017.
One statute prohibits state and local officials from sharing information with federal immigration officers and also bars the transfer of certain immigrants into federal custody. Another forbids private employers from cooperating with the federal government regarding immigration enforcement at the workplace.
“Immigration is the province of the federal government. It’s in the Constitution,” Sessions told a gathering of law enforcement officers in Sacramento on Wednesday. “There is no nullification. There is no secession. Federal law is the supreme law of the land.”
