The Democrat crisis du jour is the “Comey memo,” a fictitious document that resides in the head of New York Times reporter and loyal Democrat soldier Michael Schmidt, who “claims” that this memo, which he admits he has never seen and details about which were told to him by an anonymous source, alleges that President Trump pressured FBI Director James Comey to halt his investigation of Michael Flynn.
Schmidt’s biggest problem with his
lie report is that he has ZERO evidence of any such document and cannot even identify the boogeyman who allegedly told him about it, a source who has yet to produce the memo. Thus it must not exist. Michael Schmidt and his “Comey memo” sound like complete bullshit to me!
Furthermore, Schmidt has no credibility whatsoever, considering his ties to the Democrat Party and the fact that his employer is the Trump-hating New York Fake News Times.
Further furthermore, Comey’s testimony before Congress on May 3 (video, below) reveals one of two things – either Comey lied under oath before Congress, a felony, to help President Trump, which frankly, is unimaginable, or Michael Schmidt is a bare faced LIAR! I’m going with the latter.
Former FBI Director James Comey testified under Senate oath May 3rd that the Trump administration had not pressured his agency to halt any investigation for political purposes, reports Got News. Comey admitted that the FBI has always been free to operate without political interference—flying in the face of Democrats’ paranoid delusions about Russia and President Donald J. Trump, and exposing for what it is a new political witch hunt Wednesday by enemies within the president’s own Justice Department.
On Wednesday, DOJ appointed a special prosecutor, former FBI Director Robert Mueller, to drum up more hype about Trump’s imaginary “collusion” with Russia during the general election.
On May 9th, President Trump fired Comey, who has spent 15 years shilling for Hillary Clinton.
Videotaped testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee blows apart the phony narrative New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt wove on Tuesday, which resulted in Mueller’s appointment. Schmidt’s only sources were anonymous. They claimed that on Feb. 14th, the day after National Security Adviser Michael Flynn resigned, Trump had asked Comey to end an investigation into Flynn’s connections to Russia.
Schmidt’s allegations that Trump attempted to obstruct justice hinged on the sources’ accounts of a memo authored the same day. Schmidt, a Democrat party lackey, admitted he hadn’t even seen the document—dated nearly three months before Comey’s testimony that totally contradicted it.
Comey’s statement to Hawaii Democratic Senator Mazie Hirono from May 3rd, which Center for Security Policy analyst Nick Short noted Wednesday, exposes the Democrats once again for their political gamesmanship….
“So if the attorney general or senior officials at the Department of Justice opposes a specific investigation, can they halt that FBI investigation?” asked Sen. Hirono of Comey during the question-and-answer period of his testimony.
“In theory, yes,” replied Comey.
Hirono pressed: “Has it happened?”
Comey said, “Not in my experience. Because it would be a big deal to tell the FBI to stop doing something that – without an appropriate purpose. I mean where oftentimes they give us opinions that we don’t see a case there and so you ought to stop investing resources in it. But I’m talking about a situation where we were told to stop something for a political reason. That would be a very big deal. It’s not happened in my experience.”
— Nick Short (@PoliticalShort) May 17, 2017