Photo, above: The Snopes family, David and Barbara Mikkelson and their cat, or as I have archived the photo, “Three Pussies.”
Neil Cavuto recently reported on an unbelievably offensive TV interview of our Fraud-in-Chief Barack Hussein by a swooning Latina lapdog. In the interview Hussein actually encouraged illegal immigrants to break the law a second time and vote illegally in Tuesday’s presidential election. This was done on a live TV program that is widely seen in the Latino community.
Seriously, Barack Hussein is on video telling illegal aliens that it is OK to break the law and vote in this election because they will not be caught. Link to our article on that story…. Barack Hussein encourages illegals to vote.
The point of THIS article is how Snopes, the steaming pile of liberal doggie doo masquerading as a legitimate fact-checker, reported the blogosphere’s viral response to the interview as reported by Fox News’ Neil Cavuto on Hussein’s clear encouragement of illegals to break American law a second time.
Snopes called the Fox report of Hussein’s encouraging illegals to vote as FALSE, claiming that Hussein meant only that citizens should vote, proving that Snopes is nothing more than a liberal tool and a lying sack of dogshit!
Snopes: “In the full interview, it’s clear Obama is urging Latino citizens to vote in order to give voice to members of their community who are precluded from doing so by lack of citizenship, not urging non-citizens to vote illegally.”
LIE! Hussein is clearly encouraging illegals to vote. He said himself…. “When you vote, you are a citizen yourself, and there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, etc. The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential.”
Translation: “Go ahead, vote, no one will catch you!”
Snopes claims that the Fox video was “edited.” LIE!!!! It was not edited. Fox simply “excerpted” the portion of the interview relevant to their story, common journalistic practice. That is NOT editing! The excerpt was untouched. Actually, the full video, which Snopes is stupid enough to provide, is even more damning than the excerpt.
This is not the first problem I have had with the ASSHOLES at Snopes. When they publish something about you, you have no opportunity to defend yourself on their site, a telling problem, in my opinion. It tells us that they only want to tell their typically erroneous version of things, allowing no rebuttal, no explanation, no defense. Like I said, ASSHOLES! Do I sound bitter?
A year ago I published an article regarding Swedish vigilantes taking matters into their own hands, torching Muslim refugee centers in protest to the Muslim invasion underway in their country and all over Europe. My article went viral, receiving over a million page views the first day alone.
Snopes’ response was that Powdered Wig is “sleazy” because the featured photo I used in the article, which I got from my source, Jews News, was a generic photo of a fire in Sweden (a landfill) because they apparently could not find a photo of an actual fire of a Swedish Muslim refugee center. The use of stock photos in lieu of unavailable photos is also common journalistic practice.
Snopes labeled my entire article FALSE because the photo was not an actual Swedish Muslim refugee center burning, even though the content of the article was 100% accurate, and the true point of the story.
So, I dug through local Swedish newspapers and found several photos of Swedish Muslim refugee centers burning at the hands of the same Swedish vigilantes in my article. I then edited the article to remove the original photo and included the new featured photo. The response from the ASSHOLES at Snopes…. crickets.
This was not the only time the steaming pile at Snopes lied about Powdered Wig, calling us “sleazy.”
I believe that Snopes is a liberal Democrat tool and likely on the DNC payroll. If you want credible fact-checking stay away from the steaming pile of liberal dogshit at Snopes!
An interesting link I just discovered…. Snopes CEO arrested for fraud