H/T Joe LaVeque

The shameless arrogance of the Clintons is palpable. While still campaigning and speaking before tiny crowds as though nothing is wrong, the evidence of brazen corruption in the private unsecure server/classified email scandal has reached a new level, the obvious and illegal quid pro quo system that existed between The Clinton Foundation, The US Department of State, and foreign donors, or as I call it, the US Clinton Department of State Foundation, a hybrid name as convoluted, intertwined, and complex as the daily interactions of the two entities.

Classified and highly sensitive information contained in private emails over a private unsecure server apparently does not reach the level of criminality necessary to take down a Clinton. Of course if you are a Petraeus or a Manning or a Snowden or any other working slob who does not breathe the rare air of a Clinton, then there is no mercy for you.

Although investigators have been tripping over smoking guns, there has not been sufficient “proof” to seal the deal on the obvious pay for play scandal. Is it possible that many millions of dollars paid to the Clinton Foundation by individuals who were also granted private audience with Secretary Clinton, as well as favors only a Secretary of State could grant, be coincidence? Sure. It is also possible that I will hit the Powerball lottery for a hundred million dollars, then be struck by a meteor and killed on my way to pick up the check. The odds are about the same.

take our poll - story continues below

Who would you vote for if the elections were held today? (1)

  • Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Powdered Wig Society updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

I believe that “proof” of sufficient criminality in this case is somewhere in the not so distant future. The question is will the Wicked Witch of Benghazi be a private citizen or Queen of Earth when it is revealed. This election is a do or die situation for Hitlery, so be not surprised by any and all manner of voter fraud the Democrat Party may devise.

I also believe that sufficient proof in the US Clinton Department of State Foundation case already exists and is in the hands of the FBI and GOP who are keeping their powder dry, explaining why despite overwhelming evidence of many cases of wrongdoing the FBI did not recommend charges against Monica Lewinsky’s ex-boyfriend’s wife. To avoid both double jeopardy and a presidential pardon, they are counting on a Trump victory in November and charges filed on or after January 20,2017.

Then there is the missing six billion dollars from the Department of State under Hitlery’s watch. The Clintons, the gift that keeps on giving.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOwdRKCnNAY

From The Wall Street Journal

This is the week that the steady drip, drip, drip of details about Hillary Clinton’s server turned into a waterfall. This is the week that we finally learned why Mrs. Clinton used a private communications setup, and what it hid. This is the week, in short, that we found out that the infamous server was designed to hide that Mrs. Clinton for three years served as the U.S. Secretary of the Clinton Foundation.

In March this column argued that while Mrs. Clinton’s mishandling of classified information was important, it missed the bigger point. The Democratic nominee obviously didn’t set up her server with the express purpose of exposing national secrets—that was incidental. She set up the server to keep secret the details of the Clintons’ private life—a life built around an elaborate and sweeping money-raising and self-promoting entity known as the Clinton Foundation.

Had Secretary Clinton kept the foundation at arm’s length while in office—as obvious ethical standards would have dictated—there would never have been any need for a private server, or even private email. The vast majority of her electronic communications would have related to her job at the State Department, with maybe that occasional yoga schedule. And those Freedom of Information Act officers would have had little difficulty—when later going through a state.gov email—screening out the clearly “personal” before making her records public. This is how it works for everybody else.

Mrs. Clinton’s problem—as we now know from this week’s release of emails from Huma Abedin’s private Clinton-server account—was that there was no divide between public and private. Mrs. Clinton’s State Department and her family foundation were one seamless entity—employing the same people, comparing schedules, mixing foundation donors with State supplicants. This is why she maintained a secret server, and why she deleted 15,000 emails that should have been turned over to the government.

Most of the focus on this week’s Abedin emails has centered on the disturbing examples of Clinton Foundation executive Doug Band negotiating State favors for foundation donors. But equally instructive in the 725 pages released by Judicial Watch is the frequency and banality of most of the email interaction. Mr. Band asks if Hillary’s doing this conference, or having that meeting, and when she’s going to Brazil. Ms. Abedin responds that she’s working on it, or will get this or that answer. These aren’t the emails of mere casual acquaintances; they don’t even bother with salutations or signoffs. These are the emails of two people engaged in the same purpose—serving the State-Clinton Foundation nexus.
The other undernoted but important revelation is that the media has been looking in the wrong place. The focus is on Mrs. Clinton’s missing emails, and no doubt those 15,000 FBI-recovered texts contain nuggets. Then again, Mrs. Clinton was a busy woman, and most of the details of her daily State/foundation life would have been handled by trusted aides. This is why they, too, had private email. Top marks to Judicial Watch for pursuing Ms. Abedin’s file from the start. A new urgency needs to go into seeing similar emails of former Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills.
Mostly, we learned this week that Mrs. Clinton’s foundation issue goes far beyond the “appearance” of a conflict of interest. This is straight-up pay to play. When Mr. Band sends an email demanding a Hillary meeting with the crown prince of Bahrain and notes that he’s a “good friend of ours,” what Mr. Band means is that the crown prince had contributed millions to a Clinton Global Initiative scholarship program, and therefore has bought face time. It doesn’t get more clear-cut, folks.

That’s highlighted by the Associated Press’s extraordinary finding this week that of the 154 outside people Mrs. Clinton met with in the first years of her tenure, more than half were Clinton Foundation donors. Clinton apologists, like Vox’s Matthew Yglesias, are claiming that statistic is overblown, because the 154 doesn’t include thousands of meetings held with foreign diplomats and U.S. officials.

Nice try. As the nation’s top diplomat, Mrs. Clinton was obliged to meet with diplomats and officials—not with others. Only a blessed few outsiders scored meetings with the harried secretary of state and, surprise, most of the blessed were Clinton Foundation donors.

Mrs. Clinton’s only whisper of grace is that it remains (as it always does in potential cases of corruption) hard to connect the dots. There are “quids” (foundation donations) and “quos” (Bahrain arms deals) all over the place, but no precise evidence of “pros.” Count on the Clinton menagerie to dwell in that sliver of a refuge.

But does it even matter? What we discovered this week is that one of the nation’s top officials created a private server that housed proof that she continued a secret, ongoing entwinement with her family foundation—despite ethics agreements—and that she destroyed public records. If that alone doesn’t disqualify her for the presidency, it’s hard to know what would.