There is no question that Donald Trump is well ahead of the Wicked Witch of Benghazi in public support in the 2016 presidential election. One need look no further than rally size and social media following to see the real picture. We have been reporting what BS the polls are from the beginning. But, they just keep coming and they continue to show a close race or a solid lead by Hitlery.
Since Day One the major polling organizations have been declaring loudly and clearly that this contest is over and Hitlery is Queen. That Donald Trump guy? He doesn’t have a chance, he is wasting his time, fuhget about him. All of this is a coordinated effort between the Democrat Party, the Hitlery campaign, the totally worthless mainstream media, and the major polling organizations which are feeding engineered data to the corrupt media and We the People. The corrupt media is doing the best they can to report the lies as truth. However, it is clear that their oh-so-obvious lies are only making Donald Trump stronger and royally pissing off We the People, who have seen through them.
Only massive election fraud will win this contest for Monica Lewinsky’s ex-boyfriend’s wife, and if she wins it will be abundantly clear that massive election fraud was the way it was done. Please, everyone, wear red to the polls and take pictures so that the massive support for Trump is evident and can be used later as evidence that the election was fraudulent.
God Bless WikiLeaks for exposing the unbelievable corruption that is the Democrat Party, most recently exposing the collusion between major pollsters, the Democrat Party, and the Hitlery campaign. The Democrats can only win by cheating, and they are going all-in to win this election. If they lose, the Democrat Party is finished and the Clinton’s will almost certainly be charged with many crimes, and if there is any fairness and justice at all in our court system, the Clintons will be convicted of those many, many crimes.
Who would you vote for if the elections were held today? (1)
By Amy Moreno
At first, the pollsters were wildly oversampling Democrats – however, they got called out in that mercilessly, so now they’ve switched to oversampling women and “degreed people” who tend to favor Hillary.
They do this to get the polling result they need to promote their narrative that Hillary is CRUSHING Trump and it’s HOPELESS for Trump.
According to the Wikileaks email, the Clinton campaign gathers all their “oversampling” data and then feeds it to their MEDIA POLLSTERS.
Some history about Atlas. For more information, here is their site.
Dave Leip’s Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections was started as a paper hobby after the 1992 Presidential Election. I was 22 and attending graduate school at MIT. I made a photocopy of a U.S. map (with county boundaries) from one of the libraries and filled in counties with colored pen according to the winner. There were only two percentage points – above 45% and below 45%. I used the data for Perot, Clinton, and Bush that was published in the 1993 World Almanac and Book of Facts (there were no minor party data).
Atlas polls and graphics, based on past results, don’t make a lot of sense. States that have been primarily Republican are shown to be more Democratic or just slightly Republican.
An example is the North Dakota poll. This state has historically voted Republican. Many sites are claiming ND for Trump. Atlas? They claimed it for Hillary.
Now, does this make sense to you? I think not.
The email even includes a handy, 37-page guide with the following poll-rigging recommendations. In Arizona, over sampling of Hispanics and Native Americans is highly recommended:
Research, microtargeting & polling projects
– Over-sample Hispanics
– Use Spanish language interviewing. (Monolingual Spanish-speaking voters are among the lowest turnout Democratic targets)
– Over-sample the Native American population
For Florida, the report recommends “consistently monitoring” samples to makes sure they’re “not too old” and “has enough African American and Hispanic voters.” Meanwhile, “independent” voters in Tampa and Orlando are apparently more dem friendly so the report suggests filling up independent quotas in those cities first.
– Consistently monitor the sample to ensure it is not too old, and that it has enough African American and Hispanic voters to reflect the state.
– On Independents: Tampa and Orlando are better persuasion targets than north or south Florida (check your polls before concluding this). If there are budget questions or oversamples, make sure that Tampa and Orlando are included first.
Meanwhile, it’s suggested that national polls over sample “key districts / regions” and “ethnic” groups “as needed.”
– General election benchmark, 800 sample, with potential over samples in key districts/regions
– Benchmark polling in targeted races, with ethnic over samples as needed
– Targeting tracking polls in key races, with ethnic over samples as needed
Here, Illinois blamed their voting problems on a “calibration error”.
Early voting in Illinois got off to a rocky start Monday, as votes being cast for Republican candidates were transformed into votes for Democrats.
The conservative website Illinois Review reported:
While using a touch screen voting machine in Schaumburg, Moynihan voted for several races on the ballot, only to find that whenever he voted for a Republican candidate, the machine registered the vote for a Democrat in the same race. He notified the election judge at his polling place and demonstrated that it continued to cast a vote for the opposing candidate’s party. Moynihan was eventually allowed to vote for Republican candidates, including his own race.
Cook County Clerk’s Office Deputy Communications Director Jim Scalzitti, told Illinois Watchdog, the machine was taken out of service and tested:
This was a calibration error of the touch-screen on the machine. When Mr. Moynihan used the touch-screen, it improperly assigned his votes due to improper calibration.