Jonathan Turley is a much-respected constitutional law expert and law professor at George Washington University. He is also a proud liberal Democrat. However, unlike most liberal Democrats, Turley is honest and does not preach the party line if it is flawed, as is so often the case with the Democrat Party.

“Flawed” is a gross understatement regarding congressional Democrats’ attempt to remove a sitting president for no reason other than they want to steal his power.

Professor Turley is calling the impeachment sham an “historic blunder” and “abuse of power.” I believe it is much worse. This is a criminal conspiracy to remove a sitting president from office. This is sedition, plain and simple, punishable by 20 years in prison per count. Start indicting NOW!

Trending: Say it ain’t so, Joe! Latino voters on Telemundo give President Trump the debate win 66% to 34%

Appearing recently on CBS, Turley declared, “I think that this is one where the House is completely unmoored by history and by the law. I think that this will go down as one of the greatest historic blunders of a House of Congress.”

18 U.S. Code § 2384.Seditious conspiracy

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

Speaking before the House on impeachment and the Democrats’ weak case for bribery, Turley said, “The statement has been made, not just by these witnesses, but Chairman Schiff and others that this is a clear case of bribery. It’s not, and Chairman Schiff said that it might not fit today’s definition of bribery, but it would fit the definition back in the eighteenth century. Now, putting aside Mr. Schiff’s turn toward originalism, I think that it might come as a relief to him and his supporters that his career will be a short one, that there’s not an originalist future in that argument. The bribery theory being put forward is as flawed in the eighteenth century as it is in this century.”

Regarding the Democrats’ charge that President Trump is guilty of “abuse of power” for fighting congressional subpoenas in the courts, Professor Turley was quick to point out to the Democrats just who is guilty of “abuse of power:” ” If you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. (looking directly at the Democrats.) It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing precisely what you are criticizing the President for doing. We have a third branch that deals with conflicts of the other two branches. And what comes out of there and what you do with it is the very definition of legitimacy.

More condemnation of the Democrats’ sham trial from Professor Turley….

It should also be noted that Professor Turley, as well as his wife, has received death threats for leaving the Democrat plantation to speak the truth about the Democrats’ sham trial.